Agreement, word buy, and you may combination in a few varieties of Arabic

Agreement, word buy, and you may combination in a few varieties of Arabic

  • ^ The 5 sub-style of fillers were: crossbreed contract nouns which have a good possessive adjective (Julijin komsija “Julija’s neighbors,” in which komsija is produce Yards otherwise F contract), as in (15b); hybrid contract nouns with an effective possessive pronoun (moje cerekalo “my personal laugher,” where cerekalo can trigger Yards otherwise Letter contract), such as (15c); NSg animate nouns which have a keen ordinal matter [prvo prase “(the) very first pig,” where prase has actually a crossbreed plural mode, causing FSg or NPl agreement], such as (15d); normal contract nouns with good MSg moderate match [uspeh dekana “(the) triumph (of the) dean,” where the genitive match are homonymous on paucal, while the paucal allows paucal and MPl agreement], as in (15e); normal contract MSg nouns that have an excellent PP fit (prijatelj iz skole “the newest buddy regarding college or university,” in which destination consequences will be questioned), as with (15f).
  • ^ The fresh new salience of one’s instances is actually regulated throughout the following method. Basic, one to creator created the newest advice centered on the girl intuition, while the almost every other evaluated her or him; where conflict came up, instances had been changed together with techniques was frequent on freshly delivered instances.
  • ^ The significance of the difference between arrangement patterns inside reputation is orthogonal on the hypotheses throughout the interest of paper, as they simply create predictions concerning cousin number amongst the requirements, otherwise between the standards and the legs-range ratios. I statement these types of tests in the interests of completeness of one’s declaration, while the informed from the writers of one’s regularity.
  • ^ You will find designed and you will given a separate check out such as this, and then we are currently checking out the details.

Recommendations

Arsenijevic, B., and you may Mitic, We. (2016a). “Aftereffect of animacy and you can agentivity on operating of contract from inside the Serbo-Croatian,” in the Knowledge inside Languages and you may Brain, Picked documentation away from 3rd Novi Unfortunate Workshop on the Psycholinguistics, Neurolinguistic and you may Clinical Linguistic Research, eds S. Halupka-Resetar and you can S. Martinez-Ferreiro (Novi Sad: Professors from Opinions), 41–77.

Arsenijevic, B., and you can Mitic, We. (2016b). To the inside dependence of sex in terms of matter for the agreement which have coordinated subjects: an experimental research. J. Slavic Linguist. twenty four, 41–69.

Ba). Morphology, agreement and working memories retrieval into the sentence manufacturing: evidence away from sex and instance into the Slovak. J. Mem. Lang. 56, 65–85.

Hairdresser, H., and you will Carreiras, Yards. (2005). Grammatical sex and you can matter agreement in the Language: A keen ERP research. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 17, 137–153.

Bhatt sdc singles dating site, Roentgen., and you may Walkow, Yards. (2013). Discovering arrangement for the sentence structure: a disagreement of contract in the conjunctions. Nat. Lang. Linguist. Idea 30, 951–1013.

Bojovic, D. (2003). Neki slucajevi kongruencije koordinirane subjekatske sintagme s preponiranim i postponiranim predikatom u srpskom jeziku. Srpski Jezik 8, 539–555.

Lme4: Linear Blended-Consequences Patterns Using S4 Categories

Carminati, Meters. (2005). Handling reactions of element hierarchy (individual > matter > gender) and you will effects to have linguistic idea. Lingua 115, 259–285.

Chomsky, N. (2001). “Derivation of the Stage,” when you look at the Ken Hale. A lifestyle for the Words, ed. Yards. Kenstowicz (Cambridge: MIT Force), 1–52.

Citko, B. (2004). “Arrangement asymmetries from inside the accentuate structures,” into the Formal Approaches to Slavic linguistics: This new Ottawa Conference 2003, eds An excellent. Olga, W. Browne, cpsfnmM. Luisacpefnm Rivero, and D. Stojanovic (Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Courses), 91–108.

De- Vincenzi, Meters. (1999). Differences between new morphology regarding intercourse and amount: evidence out of creating coreferences. J. Psycholinguist. Res. twenty-eight, 537–553.

De- Vincenzi, Yards., and you will Di Domenico, Elizabeth. (1999). A change among ?-features: the latest character out-of intercourse and you will amount in the retrieval out-of pronoun antecedents. Ital. J. Linguist. eleven, 41–74.

Doron, Age. (2000). “VSO and you can kept-conjunct arrangement : biblical Hebrew versus. progressive Hebrew,” about Syntax of the Verb First Dialects, eds Good. Carnie and you may Age. Guilfoyle (New york, NY: Oxford School Push), 75–96.