Amazingly enough, Roman numerals getting smoother (which have numbers lower than unexian in any event) inside seximal

Amazingly enough, Roman numerals getting smoother (which have numbers lower than unexian in any event) inside seximal

Latin

Numbers within the Latin has their unique labels as much as ten, but 0. 0 as a number are introduced following the slide off Rome, most likely additional from the Vatican’s very own Latinist together with conditions particularly polybenum, machine-gun. 0 would have been notated sometimes because the nihil SprГіbuj tego (nothing) or nullus (none). Because of it you to, let’s have fun with nullus.

Now that’s where it becomes a small trendy, once the names to own fifteen and 20 (DEC11 and you will DEC12) try both situated off DEC10, being undecim and you can duodecim. As this seximal method is not very quantitative-centric, I believe it would be wiser to ensure they are even more half a dozen based: bis sex (double half a dozen) having 20 and unde bis gender (that off off double six) for 15. Yet not, an adverb for “by twelves” is available, bisen. I’ve found they a lot less clunky and more convenient getting numbers of dozen you to definitely dozen five if we fool around with undebisen and you will bisen getting 15 and 20, correspondingly.

Having numbers anywhere between dozen one to and you can dozen five, we are able to utilize the same program on Latin young ones (undecim, duodecim).

(Notice the change out-of bisen to help you bisin for those number.)Latin brands having multiples out of 10 always result in an excellent -ginta suffix, and that we are able to personalize becoming a -ginsa suffix to own seximal.

As for loaning nif, it becomes difficult, as the we have while making upwards Latin terminology, so there commonly of several Latin terminology you to avoid having F so you’re able to play with for instance. In this case, unlike using something similar to nifum, nifi (n) or nif, nifis (n), I might as an alternative fool around with something like nifex, nificis, n.

Multiples from nif try problematic for the Latin, just like the Latin multiples from DEC100 try contradictory at the best. At the same time, we need fifsy-five versions from nifex to arrive at any sort of all of our comparable getting unexian was. Instead of entering one to hairy mess, we shall just use next, noting your plural out of nifex is actually nifeca:

Seximal

(Notice how tres transforms to help you tria whenever combined with nifeca.)Toward -exian show, because the it is taken from a good graecolatinish base before everything else, it’s easy to transfer more, therefore the roots are exactly the same also! (Thank you so much, Misali!) We shall take of finally -n therefore we do not get they mistaken for Ancient greek language, even if.

Roman numerals to start with are dependent from DEC(step 1, 5, 10, 50, etcetera.), hence is not most seximal. To pay, we are going to change the program to have it be situated off of threes and sixes. We’ll remain 1 as i, and we’ll support the base of the program just like the X, therefore we’ll plus keep half of the base while the V. Thus, 3 was V and ten is actually X. You will find you to definitely big change in so it numeral program, however: while using the wide variety one to below the foot or 50 % of the new legs, your used to place We in advance of both good DECV or an excellent DECX otherwise whatnot, the good news is while the ft is smaller so long as provides to achieve that. Both II and you will IV can also be represent dos when you look at the seximal numerals. II helps make the numerals more simple knowing and study, however, IV shrinks them fundamentally. The fresh Romans would probably deal with often version (it by themselves sometimes blogged non-standard numerals including IIII for five instead of DECIV), thus I’ll number for benefits. The beds base squared will continue to be C (nif) and you will 50 % of which can will still be L. The beds base cubed might be M, bear in mind, and you can unexia could be personal structure, N. Just as in the original numerals, indeed there are not that to have 0 (nullus).

nullus: unus: Iduo: II / IVtres: Vquattuor: VIquinque: VII / IXsex: Xseptem: XI octo: XII / XIVnovem: XVdecem: XVIundebisen: XVII / XIXbisen: XX / XLtriginsa: Lquadraginsa: LXquinquaginsa: LXX / XCnifex: Ctria nifeca: Dsex nifeca: Munexian: N